This is the moment at which it would be believed by the court that
the property in the goods has passed from buyer to seller. The application of
the rule is different in the instance of ascertained goods and unascertained
goods.
Transfer of
Specific Or Ascertained Goods
In the case of ascertained goods, it is provided by S.17 (1) that the property in the goods
will be transferred to the buyer at the time which was agreed upon by the
parties. In order to pin point the intention of the parties as to when the
property in the goods should be passed, S.17
(2) provides
that regard shall be had to the contract, the conduct of the parties and the
circumstances of the particular case.
There are also additional rules provided for ascertaining the
intention of the parties. The first rule as provided in S.18 rule 1 is that when there is an unconditional
contract for selling specific goods that are in a deliverable state, the
property in the goods will be passed when the contract is agreed upon. This is
regardless of whether or not the date for payment or delivery has been
postponed.
The second rule under S.18 is that in the case of goods
that are not in a deliverable state and the seller has to do something to the
goods to make them deliverable, property in the goods passes when such things
are done and the buyer is notified of such.
In the case of Underwood
ltd vs Burgh Castle, the
plaintiffs intended to sell a condensing machine to the defendants. The machine
weighed 30 tons and was bolted to the ground. Thus the machine had to be
dismantled and transferred to the defendant. After dismantling the machine, as
it was about being loaded on the railway, it got spoilt. The court held that
property in the goods had not yet passed to the defendant since the goods were
not yet in a complete deliverable state when the machine got spoilt.
The third rule under S.18 is that when the goods are in a
deliverable state but the seller has to weigh, measure, test or do some other
thing to the goods in order to ascertain the price, property in the goods
passes when such thing is done and the buyer is notified.
The fourth rule provides that where the goods are delivered on a
“sale or return” term or any other such term, the property passes to the buyer
when he signifies the acceptance of the goods or he does an act that adopts the
transaction.
In a situation in which the buyer doesn’t signify any acceptance,
the property passes when the date specified for rejection is elapsed. If no
date is given, the goods will pass after a reasonable time. The determination
of a reasonable time is a question of fact.
See: Bull
vs Smith Car Sale 1962 2 All ER
Transfer of Unascertained
Goods
By the provision of S.18
rule 5(1) in the
case of unascertained or future goods by description and they are in a
deliverable state, the property passes to the buyer when they have been
unconditionally appropriated for such contract whether by the seller with the
consent of the buyer or by the buyer with the assent of the seller. The assent
could be given before or after the appropriation of the goods.
Unconditional appropriation of goods to a contract means that the
goods have been set apart from the bulk of unascertained goods and they would
be used for that particular contract without modification.
Also, if the goods are transferred by the seller to a third party
or carrier, whether selected by the buyer or not, for delivery to the buyer,
and the seller doesnt reserve a right of disposal, the goods will be considered
unconditionally appropriated to the contract S.18 rule5 (2) SOGA.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave your comment below