Fixtures in Land Law is a
concept that relates to land-they are chattels affixed to the land. Hence, any
attempt to go further on the subject-matter is a clear call to the doctrine of Quic Quid Plantatur Solo Solo Cedit. This is a common law doctrine which was received into the Nigerian Land Law. This doctrine receives
a widespread of attention from jurists and legal scholars, especially under the Nigerian Legal System. The doctrine of Quic Quid Plantatur Solo Solo Cedit simply
means that he who owns a land also owns that which is attached to the land;
things attached to it above to the heaven and to the depth of the earth. It is
for this reason we earlier submitted that the concept of fixtures is embedded
in the above stated doctrine. Click on the link to read an article on the definition and nature of land law.
Fixtures may be defined as
chattels which belong to the land; this may include anything that has become so
attached to the land that forms part of the land. Fixtures in relation to land are
chattels, because they are corporeal objects which may be moved from a point to
another or be affixed to the building and may be detached at any time. For example,
An Air Conditioner is a chattel (it is a moveable object) but it becomes a
fixture as soon as it is annexed to a land or building.
The test usually adopted to
inquire whether a chattel is capable of being referred to as a fixture to land is
a question of law. The principle adopted overtime by the courts is dependent on
the following ingredients:
a) The Decree or Mode of Annexation.
b) The Purpose or Intention of Annexation.
a) The Decree or Mode of Annexation.
b) The Purpose or Intention of Annexation.
In the case of Holland v
Hodgson (1817) L.R 7, Blackbun J. observed thus:
“There is no doubt that the
general maxim of law is, that what is annexed to the land becomes part of the
land, but it is very difficult, if not impossible to say with precision what
constitutes annexation sufficient for this purpose. It is a question, which
must depend on the circumstances of each case, as indicating intention, viz.
the decree of annexation and the object of annexation.”
The
Decree or Mode of Annexation: A chattel qualifies as a
fixture if it is fastened to the land or building either by use of nails or
screws or any object with which it may be used to fastened it to the wall. The
chattel must be dependent on another object in annexing it to the building else
it is only a chattel and not a fixture. “It must not merely stand on its weight
or on the ground.” For example, a standing fan in a building does not qualify
for a fixture, because it is standing on its weight, however, a ceiling fan
annexed to the ceiling qualifies for a fixture, because it is not resting on
its on weight.
The
Purpose or Intention of Annexation: The principle of law as it
relates to fixtures provides that a chattel becomes a fixture if it has been
attached as a permanent improvement to the land or as part of the architectural
design. We are of the opinion that where a tenant secures a floor to the
building where he occupies during the period where a valid lease is in
operation will be held to be a fixture. We refer you to the case of Vaudeville
Electric Co. v Muriset (1920) 2 CH. 74.
In summary, on the expiration
of a lease, all fixtures put to the land by the tenant without permission of
the landlord, belong to the landlord and become known as landlord’s fixtures.
The types of fixtures that may be removed by the tenants are: Trade Fixtures, Agricultural
Fixtures and Ornamental or and Domestic Fixtures.
Click to Save or and to Print this Article for free
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave your comment below