Abortion may be described as the termination of a pregnancy
by the willful act of any person. This activity impinges on many areas of Law.
Abortion and Contraception have been widely available throughout the history of
Western Civilization, despite ethical concerns on the part of some. Plato and
Aristotle both argued in favour of compulsory abortion under certain
circumstances though Hippocrates expressly disapproved of the practice. Under
Roman Law, abortion sometimes occurred but family planning was conducted mainly
through the exposure of healthy newborns – usually to protect the rights and
interests of the biological father.
Religious
authorities have taken various positions on abortion. As a matter of common law
in England and the United States, abortion was illegal any time after
quickening – when the movement of the foetus could first be felt by the woman.
Many Western countries used statutes to
codify or further restrict abortion. However, by the 20th century,
many countries had begun to legalize abortions when performed to protect the
life of the woman, and in some cases to protect the health of the woman.
Abortion
under International Law
In addition to national and regional Laws, there are
multinational and international treaties, conventions and laws that may
actually be enforced on or within
signatory nations. However, there is an inherent difficulty in the enforcement
of International Law due to the issue that state sovereignty poses. As such the
effectiveness of even binding multi- national efforts to legislate the rights
to life and liberty in general, or abortion in specific it difficult to
measure. Examples of such efforts that have bearing for Abortion Law,
nationally or internationally includes;
The
1995 Beijing Platform for Action States in paragraph 96
“The human rights of women
include their right to have control over and decide freely and responsibly on
matters related to their sexuality, including sexual and reproductive health,
free of coercion, discrimination and violence”.
The
non-binding document has been adopted by 189 countries at the United Nations
fourth World Conference on Women held in Beijing, China.
Abortion Law in Nigeria
Abortion related offences under the Nigeria law are mainly:
i. Attempt
to procure abortion, knowingly supplying things to procure abortion,
ii. Killing
an unborn child,
iii. Child
destruction and (in the case of the death of the victim) Murder or manslaughter
as the peculiar facts of each case may determine.
Attempt
to Procure Abortion
The Criminal Code Act (CC); Penal Code (P.C.); also codify
this offence. This offence is committed when: “any person with intent to procure the miscarriage of a woman, whether
or not she is with child, unlawfully administers to her or causes her to take
any poison or other noxious thing, or uses any force of any kind, or uses any
other means whatsoever.”
The offence of attempting to procure an abortion is a felony
which attracts a punishment of 14 years imprisonment.
Knowing
supplying things to procure Abortion
Any
person who unlawfully supplies to or procures for any person anything
whatsoever, knowing that it is intended to be unlawful used to procure a
miscarriage, is guilty of a felony and is liable to imprisonment for 3 years. In RV Edgal (1938) 4 WACA 133. it was
contended that the thing supplied by the appellant were mere “abaisoko leaves,
blue powder, “urine” seed and ‘kaun’
(potash) which the prosecution had not proved to be noxious, poisonous, by
definition of S. 230 of the Criminal Code. Dismissing the contention, the court
noted that section 230 spoke of “anything whatsoever” and therefore the
prosecution was not required to prove that the substance were in fact noxious.
The English Law regarding abortion has been expanded beyond
the scope of Nigeria law on the subject. In 1967, the Abortion Act was passed
in England which introduced some notable changes to section 58 and 59 of the
Offences against the Persons Act 1891. Importantly, it stipulated that a person
is not liable for the offence of procuring an abortion where such a person is a
registered medical practitioner, if two other registered medical practitioners
are of the opinion formed in good faith that the abortion should be carried out
for the purpose of:
i.
Preventing
risk to the life of the pregnant woman
ii.
Preventing
injury to the physical and mental health of the pregnant woman
iii.
Preventing
injury to existing children of her family.
iv.
Preventing
substantial risk of physical or mental abnormality in the unborn child.
The Act further provides that, in determining the necessity
for an abortion, the medical practitioner responsible may take cognizance of
the pregnant woman’s actual or foreseeable environment.
“Under Section 1 (3) of the 1967 Law, any treatment for the
termination of a pregnancy must be carried out in a “hospital registered in the
Minister of Health or the secretary of State under the National Health Services
Acts. The 1967 Act is obviously a remarkable development in the Law.
Killing
an Unborn Child
The offence of killing an unborn child in Nigeria is
created under section 328 and 236 of the Criminal and Penal
Codes Respectively. The Codes provide for the punishment of life imprisonment
for any persons who by an act of omission or commission prevents a child from
being born alive by a woman about to be delivered
of a child. Allowance is made
under section 297 and 235 of the Criminal and Penal Codes respectively for a
situation where the unborn child may be killed for the preservation of the life
of the mother. This is the only statutory expression of the preservation of the
life of a mother as a lawful justification for “abortion” under Nigeria
Criminal Law. When this provision is read in conjunction with section 228 and
229 of the criminal code, it reinforces the judicial position expressed in RV Edgal to the effect that an abortion
performed to preserve the life of a pregnant woman is lawful.
Constitutional
Aspect of Abortion
Constitutionally
abortion touches on several fundamental rights guaranteed under the constitution of Nigeria namely, the
rights to life, the Right to Privacy and family life; the Right to freedom of
thought, conscience and religion. Whenever the individual asserts any of these
rights; he invariably struggles for more leeway
against state intervention.
In the area of Criminal Law, there is no doubt that the law
relating to abortion needs to be reviewed, at least along the lines of the
English Abortion act 1967 to allow for legally supervised abortions. The
present law presents the prospects of serious physical danger to many pregnant
women seeking abortion who are forced to patronize back street abortions and
quack chemist peddling dangerous drugs.
The present Law stifles progressive development of Medical
expertise in this area because Medical practitioners are understandably afraid
to engage their skills for fear of Criminal sanctions. Despite the
Criminalization of abortion, a number of women still go ahead and fund their
own means of getting it. The need for legal but regulated abortion procedures
definitely outweighs any social harm implicit in retaining laws against the practice.
Not withstanding that that almost all countries in the world today are approving or legalising ABORTION, it stands as something negative and against humanity. Unfortunately the female world that suppose to react against abortion is instead advocating for its approval as a woman's right without knowing it is an abuse of the womanhood. Moreso, It is strongly very negative that a woman, the mother of life (one who gives Birth)turns to become a killer of life, all in the name of "RIGHT". It is indeed painfully regretable.
ReplyDeleteSuperbly written article, if only all bloggers offered the same content as you, the internet would be a far better place.. discrimination lawyer los angeles
ReplyDelete