The
fundamental characteristics of a crime is that it is an act that has been
considered injurious and sufficient to warrant punishment by the society. In
administering criminal justice, there are certain basic underlying principles
that have to be followed. These principles are put in place in order to curb
arbitrariness in the criminal justice system and to protect the criminal from
being denied common benefits of natural justice.
The
following are some of the important basic principles of criminal law:
No Act is a
Crime Except is so Stated
The first
principle to be considered is the one that posits that no act would be regarded
as a crime unless it has been pronounced so by a statute. This is encapsulated
in two common law maxims:
- Nullum crimen sine lege: This maxim interprets to mean that “no act is criminal except
that defined to be so by the law”.
- Nulla poene sine lege: This maxim means that “no citizen can be made to suffer any
punishment except in accordance with the law”.
The above
can be aligned with A.V Dicey’s view that men are ruled by the law and the law
alone. A man should be punished for the breach of the law and nothing else but
the law.
The above is
also supported by the provision of S.36(12) of the 1999 Constitution,
which provides that no person should be convicted of a criminal offence except
it is defined and the penalty is described in a written law. And a written law
refers to an Act of the National Assembly, the law of a state, a subsidiary
legislation or instrument under the provisions of a law.
Criminal Law
Cannot Be Retroactive
The second
basic principle is that criminal statutes shouldn’t be retroactive. This means
that laws should not go back in time to hold people liable for actions carried
out before the law is put in place. This principle is encapsulated by provision
of S.36(8) of the 1999 Constitution.
It provides
that no person shall be held guilty for an act or omission that did not at the
time constitute a crime, and no penalty should be given to an act except the
penalty that was in force at the time.
The Constitution also
clearly provides in S.4(9) that no legislature shall have the
power to make a law that has a retrospective effect.
Presumption
Of Innocence
The third
principle is the presumption of innocence. This is a very well established
principle contained in both the laws of evidence and procedural law. It is
contained the provision of S.36(5) of the Constitution which
provides that every person that has been charged with an offence in a criminal
case shall be presumed innocent until proven guilty.
Judicial
Review
Another
important principle is the power of an appellate court to quash the conviction
of a lower court if it feels that there is a miscarriage of justice. This
principle is well established in the doctrine of judicial precedence(Stare
decisis), where decisions of courts of higher jurisdiction are binding
on courts of lower jurisdictions. For example, it is provided in S.240
of the Constitution that the Court of Appeal has the right to hear
appeal from the High Court and other courts of concurrent jurisdiction with the
high court.
At the
appeal, it should be established before the court that the trial court has
erred in law or fact or in both law and fact. If this is sufficiently proved,
the appellate court can quash the decision of the lower court.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Leave your comment below