NIGERIAN LAW CLAZ

Learn the Law with M.P Daniel...

WELCOME TO NIGERIAN LAW CLAZ

LightBlog

UPDATES

24 Jun 2017

LEGAL EDUCATION: ITS IMPACTS AND HOW IT CAN BE IMPROVED




DEFINITION OF LEGAL EDUCATION
Legal education is the system of training students to become legal specialists. Such training is given in educational institutions that are devoted to the study of law. It can also be seen as a body of knowledge about the government, administration, and law. Possession of a legal education serves as a basis for professional legal activity. The elements of legal education in each period of history have corresponded to the level of development of legislation and jurisprudence.
 
LEGAL EDUCATION IN NIGERIA
Legal education in Nigeria is patterned after the system in England except that whereas lawyers in England are solicitors or barristers, all lawyers in Nigeria qualify and can practice as both barristers and solicitors.
Legal education in Nigeria consists of academic study for 4 to 5 years (depending on the mode of entry) in a law faculty and a year in the law school followed by call to the Nigerian Bar and enrollment as a legal practitioner at the Supreme Court.

It is the National Universities Commission (NUC) that established minimum academic standards for the conferment of law degrees (LL.B).
Likewise, the Council of Legal Education has established requirement which a law degree must satisfy before it can qualify its holder for admission into the Nigerian Law School for a BL. This therefore subjects law faculties to two accreditations: one by the NUC and another by the Council of Legal Education (CLE).
In recent times, there has been growing concern about the deterioration of Nigeria’s educational system stemming from the quality of our university graduates, which has become less than satisfactory and the law graduates are no exception. Hence the growing demand for reforms not only in legal education but of the entire educational system in the country.
Since lawyers are required to have legal education before they can be called to the Bar, what constitutes the purpose of legal education?

According to NUC’s document on Minimum Academic Standards for law in Nigerian universities: “Academic legal education should therefore act, first, as a stimulus to stir the student into the critical analysis and examination of the prevailing social, economic and political systems of his community and, secondly, as an intellectual exercise aimed at studying and assessing the operation, efficacy and relevance of various rules of law in society.”
Undoubtedly, all human activities in their social, economic, political and environmental contexts, take place within a legal framework. It is therefore necessary, according to the NUC revised Minimum Academic Standards for Law, “that the student of law should also have a broad general knowledge and exposure to other disciplines in the process of acquiring legal education.”
Lawyers, as judges, in private or corporate practice, in the academics or in government, shape the society and the lives of their fellow human beings.”
On paper, it looks as though the system that produces lawyers in Nigeria is foolproof and devoid of cracks, but a closer inspection has revealed that this is not the case.

On one hand, the Nigerian lawyer oversees major financial and property transactions, often preparing the instrument of transfer and his statutory declaration of compliance is a sine qua non for the registration of a company. He also represents his clients in civil and criminal matters in court where he serves as mouthpiece. . A law student goes through the University and then on to the Law School. It is after he has passed the Bar Examination and has been found worthy in character that he is called to the Nigerian Bar.

THE IMPACTS OF LEGAL EDUCATION IN NIGERIA
Education is supposed to provide students with the general ability to think critically and independently and apply this line of independent thinking to the practical aspects of what they have been taught.
The Nigerian legal education system has produced some of the best brains in legal practice but there is still room for improvement and the full utilization of the vast potential.

The quality of lawyers turned out every year has been on the wane. We have lawyers who cannot draft processes, who cannot speak good English and who argue illogically. A lawyer should stand out from the crowd, even if he/she is not in active legal practice.
The blame here lies largely on our training institutions, particularly our Law Faculties and the Nigerian Law School. The Law Faculties of Universities owe a duty to adequately prepare Nigerian Law Students for the largely procedural law that will be studied at the Nigerian Law School and encountered in practice. That way, the transition from substantive law to procedural law will not be too sudden. The law school, in turn, owes a duty to ensure that those who are eventually called to Bar are competent and can defend their Call to Bar Certificates at all times. Every year (sometimes once, sometimes twice) over 3, 000 (Three Thousand) lawyers are released into the society and many of them do not have a clue about what legal practice entails. In most cases, they have to be trained all over again by their prospective Chambers.
The Legal Profession has therefore suffered from the problems experienced by the institutions of legal education, most especially:

· Lack of synergy between the institutions (Law Faculties and Law School).
The bulk of what is taught in Nigerian Faculties of law is substantive law which tells us what law ought to be (de lege ferenda) instead of procedural law which deals with what law is (lex lata). When students arrive at the Nigerian Law School, from Nigerian Universities, they are immediately faced with the remarkable difference or distinction between what is taught by both institutions of learning. This makes for an awkward transition for the law students. In some cases, a good number of them never quite grasp the complexity of what they are facing since it all seems so surreal. the Council of Legal Education, in a bid to build a synergy between the Nigerian Law School and Nigerian faculties of law, it has stipulated the courses to be offered and taught in Nigerian Universities. A couple of Nigerian faculties of law still offer some decidedly strange law courses which are not approved by the Council of Legal Education and which do not positively influence the making of a Nigerian Lawyer. A lot of Nigerian Universities have no room in their curriculum for the practical aspect of law, which is what is taught at the Nigerian Law School.

· Too many students.
The problem of too many students is a lack of synergy with the Nigerian Law School. Nigerian Faculties of law admit too many students. It is quite understandable that faculties of law seek to make Legal Education available to all and sundry but the downside of this desire is that the Nigerian faculties of law end up exceeding their quota at the Nigerian law school (each faculty of law is allowed to sell Law School forms to a particular number of its students). The availability of these forms is dependent on how highly the said Faculty of Law is rated by the Council of Legal Education. Some Nigerian Faculties of law, despite the said rating, still admit more than their prescribed quota so we have instances where a particular faculty of law is entitled to say, 50 Law School Forms every year, but ends up graduating 250 students! Invariably, there is a backlog of students who eagerly await their respective turns to obtain Law School Forms. These are fallouts from the initial problem of admitting far more students than the faculty is entitled to.

· Lack of basic facilities.
There is a need for Nigerian Faculties of Law to conform to the ever increasing standards of legal practice, setbacks like poor funding; lack of basic infrastructure; poor power supply, lack of standard lecture halls, lack of Information Technology equipment and poorly equipped libraries, inadequate accommodation and transport system problems. This is a rather disturbing trend as many Nigerian Faculties of Law helplessly accept these conditions and have somehow attuned themselves to them instead of thinking outside the box. Thus, we have Law Students who are not I.T Compliant, due to no fault of theirs, but because the system has not allowed them to be so. It is generally believed that learning in a conducive environment enables a student to assimilate much faster. When a student is taught in an environment where he has no access to information, relevant books, good lecture halls, basic amenities like electricity or water, he/she inevitably spends more time attending to issues well outside the ambit of what he is taught in school. Sadly, this is the lot of a good number of law students, It is thus obvious that Nigerian law students are held back from fully developing their potentials by poor facilities.

· Very few lecturers in faculties of law who actually practise law.

· Incessant Industrial Actions.


HOW LEGAL EDUCATION CAN BE IMPROVED
THE WAY FORWARD

(A) Synergy in curriculum between Nigerian Faculties of law and the Nigerian law school.
Over 70% of a Lawyer’s foundation is the job of the University he/she attends. It is therefore important that the Universities prepare a law student adequately for the complexities of legal practice. A lawyer must not only demonstrate intelligence and great wit, he is also supposed to be honest and above board. The issue is sometimes out of the hands of the Universities as the foundation of some students might have been severely damaged in Secondary School. Education in Nigeria is at its lowest ebb and even though the authorities are rising to the challenge, there is still a lot to do.
At the Law School, a law graduate is introduced to the ethics of the profession but one wonders if nine (9) months is not too short a period for this. The Law Faculties could be made to incorporate professional ethics into their curriculum over the five (5) sessions that a law student is expected to spend in the University. Overtime, the ethics of the profession become engraved in the minds of the law students who will most likely know them by heart by the time they graduate.. It should also be a pre-condition that a Law Student must be found worthy both in learning and in character before he/she is sent to the Nigerian Law School

B)    Rating of Faculties
Faculties of law in Nigeria should be rated annually. This rating should be continuous with the parameters clearly stated. It should also be the basis upon which law school forms are issued to these faculties of law, regardless of their previous standing with the Council of Legal Education. This way, there would be competition which would only bode well for the legal profession in the long run as a favourable.

C) We must collectively address the need for more skills-based and practice-oriented syllabus and scope of learning within the existing calendar; promote compulsory pupillage for young lawyers after graduation from the law school before graduates can practice on their own; ensure adequate mentoring and a dignified and sustainable welfare package for young lawyers to motivate them to work harder; advocate for improved financing for qualitative academic legal education and prudent management of resources at the universities/law faculties.

CONCLUSION
There is no doubt that legal education in Nigeria has come a long way. We now have more campuses of the Nigerian law school than before, more faculties of law, more law students and by extension, more lawyers. This is an encouraging development but it is not enough. We need to know that their quality is such that they can stand among the best in the world. 

This should be our collective objective. Today’s lawyer lack adequate preparation for the basics of legal practice and this lack of preparedness stems from the problems already highlighted. There is a need to adjust legal education in Nigeria to be more in tune with what obtains in the developed parts of the world.We should aim not only to have as many lawyers as possible but also to have lawyers we can be proud of at all times; both intellectually and otherwise. We are not where we are supposed to be but we are also not where we were before. 

Resource Person:
Writers' Club, Faculty of Law,
Nasarawa State University

No comments:

Post a Comment

Leave your comment below